Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01337
Original file (PD 2014 01337.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      CASE : PD -20 14 - 0 1337
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 201 4 0605
Separation Date: 20060202


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SRA/E-4 (2T1/Vehicle Operations Craftman) medically separated for depressive disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS) associated with cognitive disorder NOS. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a temporary P4/S4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The depressive disorder NOS associated with cognitive disorder NOS conditions, characterized as “medically unacceptable” and was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “depressive disorder NOS associated with cognitive disorder NOS” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “My initial diagnosis given by the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) in 2006, category I unfitting conditions: “Depressive Disorder, not otherwise specified associated with cognitive disorder, not otherwise specified possibly related to blast injury (or anxiety) Social and Industrial Adaptability Impairment. I was not diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) prior to my discharge from active duty.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting depressive disorder NOS associated with cognitive disorder NOS conditions is are addressed below and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that her case may be eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of her mental health (MH) condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed during that process. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20060202
 VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Depressive Disorder NOS, associated with Cognitive Disorder NOS 9434 10% Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 8045-9411 10% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x4 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070306 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])

ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges the presence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a s ervice - connected condition by the VA, but notes that the scope of its recommendations does not extend to conditions which were not diagnosed or in evidence at the time of medical separation. This includes conditions which may have had early manifestations during active service, since such sub-clinical conditions cannot be correlated with a fitness determination requisite for a rating.

Depressive Disorder NOS a ssociated with Cognitive Disorder NOS Condition . The CI had a history of depression and associated PTSD symptoms which occurred after he sus tained a blast injury while in theatre as a result of his Humvee being struck by a missile on 6 November 2004. A head CT scan performed because of blast related headaches was negative . The CI was diagnosed with rule out PTSD in April 2005. Also in April 2005, a neurologist evaluation was performed and the CI was diagnosed with migraine headaches the occurred once a week and was treated with abortive anti-migraine medications. He was followed closely by Family Advocacy and had a substantiated claim of spousal abuse in June 2005 which resulted in a referral to Life Skills and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention Team (ADAPT) . He was continued on an anti-depressant medication (Celexa). The CI underwent extensive n europsychological testing on 29 July 2005 which demonstrated a variety of somatic complaints and dysfunctional negative emotions, anxiety, concern in health matters, low self-esteem and internal conflict with regard to work . The examiner further noted t hat features of a PTSD condition were significantly represented. The examiner opined that the testing findings yielded ev idence of mildly impaired short –term memory and a moderate depression with low self-confidence. The examiner diagnosed p ost - c onc u ssion s yndrome, s omatoform disorder NOS, and PTSD with a G lobal Assessment Functioning (GAF) of 65 ( some difficulty in social, occupational, or school functioning, but generally functioning pretty well, has some meaningful interpersonal relationships ) . The CI was given a temporary P4 / S4 p rofile and the c ommander’s s tatement noted that th e CI’s medical condition interfered with his MOS duties and he had become unreliable. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported cognitive changes, an inability to multi task, an inability to accept changes quickly and that in the past year he had received six letters of reprimand (LOR) for poor attention to detail. He reported continued difficulty in functioning in a work environment. The CI also had migraine headaches approximately twice weekly which were “incapacitating" and complained of equilibrium problems . The examiner documented that t he CI had continued difficulty with mood, short term recall, multitasking and executive function. He diagnosed d epressive disorder NOS, exacerbated by blast injury ; c ognitive d isorder, secondary to blast injury and a GAF of 75 (i f symptoms are present they are transient and expectable reactions to psychosocial stressors ) with a moderate impairment for military service and a mild impairment for social, industrial adaptability. The CI was hospitalized in a psychiatric in- patient unit for symptoms of binge drinking , depression, feeling overwhelmed with life and marital discord . The examiner diagnosed depression and chronic PTSD. The records from th at admission are not available for Board review. The CI was seen post discharge and the examiner noted that t he CI reported feeling much better and wasn’t sure if it was his new psychotropic medication or because he had been away from his problems. He was following up with t he ADAPT program for an alcohol- related incident. The examiner continued the diagnoses of depression and chronic PTSD. In January 2006 , the p sychiatrist documented that the CI endorsed PTSD symptoms of hypervigilance , intrusive memories provoked by smells, poor concentration and depression. The CI did not report for a VA Compensation and Pension (C& P) exam; therefore , there is no C&P exam evidence for the Board to review. The VARD present for review docume nts that the VA granted service- connection for PTSD and rated it 10% based on the CI ’s STRs .

The SRP concluded the MH diagnosis was changed or eliminated to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process and ; therefore , met the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The PEB coded the d epressive d isorder NOS a ssociated with c ognitive d isorder NOS as 9434 and rated at 10%. The VA coded the PTSD as 8045 (r esiduals of traumatic brain injury with 9411 ) and rated at 10% based on the STR . The CI suffered a traumatic event when his Humvee was struck by a missile meeting C riteria A for PTSD. He endorsed intrusive memories of the event meeting C ri teria B. The board considered C riteria C for the PTSD diagnosis and look for evidence the CI had three symptoms of avoidance/numbing a s required to meet that criteria. Self-medication may account for avoidance, but the memory issues were most likely related to his cognitive disorder, he had a good relationship with his daughter and his affect was nearly always normal. Psych testing was performed and mainly documents cognitive problems and that his memory function was mildly impaired , again most likely related to his cognitive disorder and depression; although testing revealed that “features of PTSD were significantly represented.” Board members agree that the eviden ce does not support the CI met C riteria C for the diagnosis of PTSD ; therefore, the diagnosis of d epressive disorder was appropriate .

The PEB adjudication occurred prior to the promulgation of the National Defense Authorization Act 2008 mandate for DOD adherence to VASRD §4.129 and the service did not apply the §4.129 requirement. The Board, IAW DoDI 6040.44 and DoDI guidance (which applies current VASRD §4.129 to all Board cases as appropriate), agrees that the stipulations of §4.129 are met in this case and will thus recommend a minimum 50% PTSD rating for a retroactive 6-month period on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Evidence from the time of initial separation, including the MEB NARSUM does not support a rating greater than 50%. Therefore a rating of 50% is assigned for the reconstructed TDRL period IAW with VASRD §4.129. The Board must then determine the most appropriate fit with VASRD 4.130 criteria at 6 months after separation for its permanent rating recommendation. The most proximate source of comprehensive evidence on which to base the permanent rating recommendation in this case are the STR notes in December 2005 and January 2006. A note prepared 3 months prior to separation documents that the CI was exercising regularly, had more energy, experienced no side-effects from his medication and his mental status exam was normal. There was no evidence for review within a year after separation. The next available post separation evidence was a C&P exam 6 years later that documented the CI was in a stable, long term relationship, was working full time and continued his psychotropic medications. That exam utilized language that directly reflected a 10% rating. The Board adjudged that the evidence supported a 10% rating after the 6-month reconstructed TDRL period. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a TDRL rating of 50% and a permanent rating of 10% for the depression NOS condition coded 8045-9434.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating d epressive disorder NOS was likely operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by the Board. In the matter of the d epressive d isorder related to blast injury condition, the Board unanimously recommends a s ervice disability rating of 50% for a prescribed 6- month period of temporary retirement IAW VASRD §4.129; followed by a 10% permanent rating, coded 8045- 94 34 , IAW VASRD §4.130. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


invalid font number 31502


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified to reflect a disability rating of 50% for the prescribed period of temporary retirement (IAW §4.129), and then a permanent 10 % rating , effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
TDRL PERMANENT
Depressive Disorder related to Blast Injury 8045- 94 34 50% 10%
COMBINED 5 0% 10%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 10318 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record




                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01337.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended modification of your assigned disability rating without re-characterization of your separation with severance pay.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

                                                               Sincerely,





 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachments:
1. Directive
2. Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR
DFAS-IN

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00146

    Original file (PD-2013-00146.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that the cognitive deficits of memory, concentration, attention problems and the emotional/behavioral problems of irritability and mood swingscould not be apportioned between the PTSD and TBI conditions and are subsumed in the §4.130 rating.Therefore, members agreed that the preponderance of the evidence with regard to the functional impairment of the PTSD condition (including decreased memory, attention and concentration) favors its recommendation as an unfitting condition...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01677

    Original file (PD-2014-01677.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB then found the following conditions as meeting retention standards and forwarded these to the PEB for further consideration: attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder; alcohol dependence, with physiological dependence (episodic) and personality disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS).The PEB adjudicated “left thigh and knee pain secondary to old distal femoral fracture requiring intramedullary rod,”“chronic right ankle pain” and “chronic left ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 0%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00735

    Original file (PD2009-00735.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and was found unfit for continued military service due to PTSD and TBI, rated 10% each. In this case the symptom complex includes decreased attention and concentration, mildly impaired memory, mildly impaired efficiency of processing, mild to moderate impairment of high level problem solving, mild sleep disturbance (insomnia), and headaches. These other conditions are all judged by the Board to be not unfitting at the time of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01708

    Original file (PD 2014 01708.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20061215 The MEB narrative summary exam approximately 15 months prior to separation documented that the CI demonstrated a depressed mood, congruent affect, occasional tearfulness and suicidal ideation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00420

    Original file (PD2009-00420.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI, found unfit only for the PTSD condition, was determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The CI completed his deployment and on return to the States had increasing symptoms of TBI including headaches, cognitive defects and a diagnosis of PTSD. Regarding TBI as a possible new unfitting condition: As noted in the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00923

    Original file (PD2013 00923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post hospitalization note, 29 December 2008, recorded improvement in mood symptoms, noted stability of symptoms with medication, and recorded a diagnosis of “cognitive deficits NOS”, PTSD chronic, with a rule out of psychotic depression. 3 June 2009, approximately 1-year after separation, the VA increased disability rating to 70% for the conditions of psychosis with cognitive disorder and residuals of brain lesion (claimed as dermoid cyst, cognitive problems, speech problems, traumatic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00213

    Original file (PD 2013 00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted the MH condition was rated 100% by the VA. The Board agreed this was not supported by the record, specifically the VA C&P statement of no total occupational and social impairment . The Board agreed that, at the time of separation, the CI had been working and was socially involved and symptoms were controlled with medication, and/ or related to exogenous factors not ratable .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00248

    Original file (PD2011-00248.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neurologic examination performed on December 3, 2004 was normal and he was ambulating without difficulty. However, the Board also noted residuals of frontal lobe injury not merely restricted to mild memory dysfunction that included problems other cognitive functions (decreased verbal processing, attention, and concentration), irritability, anger, and problems with impulse control reflected in neuropsychological testing and the initial VA mental health clinic encounter 9 months after...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00744

    Original file (PD2011-00744.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON: Service IPEB – Dated 20080317 Condition Code Rating Cognitive Disorder s/p Closed Head Injury; Associated with PTSD, Depressive Disorder Migraine Headaches 8045‐9304 10% Not Unfitting VA (2 Mo. The Board noted that PEBs often combine multiple conditions under a single rating when those conditions considered individually are not separately unfitting and would not cause the member to be referred into the DES or be found unfit because of physical disability. Although the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00096

    Original file (PD2009-00096.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudged the PTSD, TBI, and Neural Hearing Loss to be unfitting for continued military service. PTSD Rating Recommendation . The most proximate source of comprehensive evidence on which to base the permanent rating recommendation in this case is an extrapolation from the MEB exam (6 mo pre-separation), the VA initial psychiatric rating evaluation (2 weeks pre-separation) and the VA PTSD review evaluation (21 months after separation) including VA...